The estimated history of the world has now reached five and a half thousand with the help of archaeological excavations. Its most astonishing discoveries are the documents found in Mesopotamia written on clay tablets, and Sumer and Ebla, the oldest civilizations ever discovered, have also left their written capital.
Nowhere in this known period of human history is there a sign that hints at even the slightest hint of "feminist or maternal head or female ruler." The idea for the existence of a feminist society was founded in 1861 by a Swiss professor named Johann Jacob Bokhofen. She traced all the traditions from Greek history and mythology to the female kingdom.Scholars such as Herbert Spencer, Louis Henry Morgan, Sir John Lوبbeck, William Robertson, etc. later joined in support of this "revolutionary ideology". The theory was widely circulated in the 19th century for more than 30 years, and people like Sigmund Freud and Karl Marx were influenced by it. But then he succumbed to the harsh criticism of some anthropologists, and at the beginning of the 20th century, he was not convinced by any notable scholar except Russian experts. When anthropologists were no longer convinced of this, then a new plant of philosophers like Jane Allen Harrison, George Thompson, etc. took up the task at the beginning of the 20th century. Some archaeologists, such as Crawford, have repeated this theory from time to time, and Sir James George Fraser has exaggerated the point. Most of the Turks did not believe that woman was worshiped in prehistoric times but they were convinced that woman was the head of the society and it was a parent free society. These were the people who presented the sculptures with feminine features found in the archaeological excavations as evidence. Surprisingly, all these ideologies made "prehistory" a hotbed of speculation because the results of "written history" were so clear that there was no denying that a patriarchal society Can be denied. With this in mind, the idea was also coined that five thousand years ago, because men had dominated, so we have nothing to do with this era! The idea came to her in the 1960s and '70s when feminist movements began to emerge in the United States and Europe. And they also insisted that prehistoric woman was not only highly regarded but was regularly worshiped! These dates and names are too long and it is not possible to cover them in full, given the length of the article. In short, his greatest advocate in recent times was "Maria Jimbotas" who continued to propagate this ideology until her death (1921-1994). She herself is counted among the archaeologists, but she created the most famous name by presenting various theories about the "female emperor and her worship in prehistoric times". He describes in these words the whole scenario of what this theory is historically "Once upon a time, many civilizations of the world were all part of a" feminist era. " The patriarchal system had not yet come into being and it was thought that women would bear fruit like trees when they ripen. The birth of children was considered a mystery. This limitation was both necessary and enviable. Women were worshiped for this reason, they were considered superior for this reason. The men lived on the outskirts of the town, they were merely convertible laborers and worshipers of the women's centre! Which were the source of life. Discovering the patriarchal system, having sex just to have children, was as destructive to society as discovering the secret of fire or tearing an atom! Gradually, the idea of "men's guardianship of children" also gained strength. The "motherland" system was also affected by successive attacks by gypsies. The quarrel between peasants and hunters was in fact a battle between male dominated civilizations and female dominated civilizations! As a result, women gradually lost their independence, mystery and superiority. For more or less five thousand years, the period of feminism was a time of peace and production. "This is the history invented by the feminist and it has nothing to do with history or archaeology!" In short, the main points of this theory are: That "Before history began to be written, the centre of society was the woman, who was considered superior and worthy of worship because of her" mysterious birth process, "because the man was aware of the sexual act but did not yet know it. The birth of a child is the result of this process. So he likened this process to the process of growing flowers and leaves on trees. And as soon as he brought these fruits and flowers, he thought that only a woman is capable of giving birth to children alone. Due to her special ability, she was the first woman to invent the profession of agriculture and was able to cultivate it. The extent of this cultivation was such that it sowed seeds in the ground which produced crops in the natural environment. Plowing, irrigation systems, etc. did not exist yet. There were women who raised their children together, all women participated in the upbringing of children without any discrimination. Women can have sex with a man whenever they want. Permanent couples were not customary. Homosexuality was not a defect in women. There was no concept of adultery or any other kind of immorality. Men were second-class citizens because they were incapable of birth. This condition lasted for millions or thousands of years. Then about five thousand years ago today, a great change took place. Suddenly men realized that they are equal partners in the process of birth and if they do not have intimacy with the woman then reproduction cannot take place. He took advantage of the low power of women during menstruation and then from this menstruation he also learned that the blood of others can be shed. At the same time the practice of cultivating individual fields or crops ceased and people were able to plow and dig canals to bring water to cultivable lands, as this work required more labour and strength which was found in men. She used to go, so she overcame these tasks as well. The men also learned to tame animals and during this process they became aware of the process of beating and its benefits and later they used the same methods on the oppressed women. At the same time, perhaps after the attacks of the nomadic tribes, where men were predominant due to ignorance, or the connections established with them, the men of these mother societies suddenly realized what it meant to be a man. Due to these disasters and immense social changes, the society was dominated by oppressive men and a five thousand year period of horror and barbarism began. Although this change, which took place about five thousand years ago, was horrible, it was necessary to move the world further. Now this horror and barbarism is reaching its limits, so it has become necessary to bring back the era of feminism. ”According to feminists, the only way to read every ancient civilization in the world is to first find a goddess mother in it, even if archaeology or history does not testify to it, because in known human history whose written capital we also have. Yes, this is impossible, so their only argument is the statues of women that belong to prehistoric times. Syed Sibt Hassan has made such an effort in his book "Shrine of the Past". He writes:The man of the age of prosperity lived in small tribes. The style of these tribes was social, panchayat or communal and there was no distinction between men and women, big or small, but the whole tribe was considered as one. However, women had an advantage over men. In addition to collecting flowers, she also gave birth to children. That is, the woman was directly responsible for the existence and growth of the tribe. The relationship between the intimacy of a man and the birth of a child was not known to man at that time. Therefore, he considered reproduction to be the work of a single woman. Some of the older tribes in Australia and America still think so. At the beginning of the Hijri period, the unity of the tribe remained intact and even stronger, however, the status of women within the tribe became secondary. It was a time of hunting wild animals, because now man was making axes and spears by attaching sharp pieces of stone to wood. ” Then he mentions the idols found in Jarmo and Halaf and surprisingly only the female idols say:
"The oldest statues in Iraq have been found in Jarmo and Halaf. These statues date back to the same agricultural and Umayyad system. These statues are of pregnant women and their breasts and abdomen are very prominent. Statues of this type have been found extensively on the island of Crete, on the plateau of Anatolia, in the valley of the Indus, and in Greece, Egypt, and Phenicia. In fact, there is hardly an old region of the world where statues of a pregnant woman have not been found. That's why there are so many statues of pregnant women in Baghdad, Cairo, Istanbul, Mohenjo-daro, Athens, Rome, Paris, Moscow, London, New York, Berlin, Peking and Tokyo. " Syed Sibt Hassan wrote these words at a time when feminist movements were gaining momentum in America and Europe in the 70's and ancient civilizations were also being looked at through their lens. At the same time, the idea of "Mother Earth" was being formed, and the historical foundations of this idea were being laid not in "known history" but in "unknown history" or what we also call prehistory. According to him, all the antiquities that belong to prehistoric times and for which there is no written material to explain them, lead to the same "motherly or feminist" society, whether it be in Europe. The caves contain some lines drawn by prehistoric humans or very ancient statues that are thought to be feminine. One of the methods used in psychology to examine the thoughts that arise in the subconscious of the servant is to show him various meaningless pictures and the patient is asked to tell what you see in them. And then with the help of the answers obtained from it, it is estimated what kind of thoughts are being nurtured in his subconscious. For example, it is quite possible for a psychiatrist to see a naked young lady between half-diagonal lines or to think that a lion is roaring with open mouth, a woman is breastfeeding her child or the devil is peeping through them. That is, he can make any sense of these diagonal lines according to his subconscious desire. In modern times, an art known as "abstract art" is very popular. In it, the artist draws some half-slanted impressions according to his imagination, and it is now up to the critics to make sense of it. Even now, if an animal puts a few lines on paper or canvas, it is considered that it is creating art. That's why "Painter Monkey, Painter Elephant" and even "Predictive Octopus" are so important. The only thing that can be said with certainty about all these phenomena is that everyone is completely free to express themselves about them, because the one who has these creations either does not exist or he is not able to explain them. What did he mean by that? And whatever explanation someone offers will be an indication of his own subconscious or subconscious, not of the creator. For example, caves in France or Europe with some diagonal lines found on the walls, and researchers estimate that they may have been created by humans millions or even more than 50,000 years ago. When they look at archaeology, they see at most two female organs in it. In 1910, a French archaeologist named Henry Braville or Abby Braville, who was also a Christian pastor, was asked about the lines found in caves in France and other parts of Europe. What are the pictures of? So Henry, who will be only 33 years old at the time, and perhaps in spite of his youthful vigor, but as a pastor, would have been deprived of sexual intercourse. He said the same word "special to the woman"! The word of this particular place became so ingrained in the minds of these feminists that if they see anywhere in the world two or three diagonal lines of ancient civilization or any meaningless image, they begin to say that ancient man has either made a woman or Be specific! Even these humorous people have described different types of lines as manifestations of different types of special places. The limit is that in these caves, the half-diagonal lines which give the impression that they are a manifestation of the male genitalia, they have also proved that the stretch is a female genitalia and where the intellect gives a complete answer by interpreting. It has been said there that in this image, in fact, a mixture of both sexes, that is, male and female, has been presented. Zarif, a feminist, also suggested that such a diagonal line found in a cave in France was an outline of the motherland, in whose womb the sperm was shown! That is, man 10,000 years ago was also able to peek inside a woman's womb! In fact, the term has a deeper meaning to them because it proves the fertility and birth of women to them and it also proves that the prehistoric society was the Umayyad society where woman ruled. Aside from the carvings on the yaws, there are small sculptures that have been recovered from different parts of the world, especially from Europe, and which do not have a head, legs or any other organ, nor the part called the body. Maybe there is a breast-like sign on it or some other symbol due to which it can be called feminine. For example, a small prehistoric statue that has no arms, no legs, no neck but feels like a child or an adult who was completely unaware of the shape of the statue. A small mound of mud has been collected and a hole has been made in the place of its mouth and two holes have been made in the place of its eyes. Maria has also called it the "Mother Earth" statue. Another joke is that the shape of a hand-bent clay that is only two and a half inches in size and has nothing noticeable on it, it just feels like someone gave it a shape in ancient times. Tried, even about the curved part of it, they have the idea that it is actually a woman's hips that someone made! Another eloquence regarding the idols whose male organ is clearly visible is to believe that it is actually an idol of the mother earth which had a male organ! Some statues dating to 4800 BC have been found at a site in Yugoslavia with a parrot-like face and anatomy does not indicate whether they are male or female, but they insist they may or may not be. Or the image of their infamous mother earth! The more ironic claim is that instead of human statues, various human organs have been found to be made of clay, and many of them are largely male organs. The same claim is made about them that they are actually idols of Mother Earth! In fact, none of these statues can be considered definitively statues of women, except to prove by some means that she is a woman. Along with the statues of these women, statues of men have also been found along with such statues whose sex cannot be ascertained as there is no sign of male or female body parts on them. Also found were statues of domestic animals. It is an accusation against the ancient man that he must have worshiped idols, especially the idols of women with feminine features. Another shortcoming in the theory of the idols of this motherland is that they are claimed to have been found in different parts of the world, and from this they themselves have come to the conclusion that every civilization must worship them or that they Will be used in some sorcery or women will have a special place in this society. It is as if they make the archaeology of the whole world their argument as a whole and then make the same assumptions about different societies. From Europe, for example, if they believe that such statues have been discovered pointing to the motherland, they are convinced that such statues could be found in the Near East, Mesopotamia and its environs. That is what will happen. Even a student of anthropology cannot accept this view. Today Hollywood movies that are like the idol worship of the old days show a character of a woman and a character of a woman is also shown in the movies of sub-continent of Pakistan and India. The creation of is in accordance with the social consciousness of both. A few thousand years from today, even if this age goes to sleep under the dust and then the servant who is thousands of years later discovers it, then he will probably say after seeing both the phenomena that woman was worshiped everywhere! However, in our consciousness, even its name and sign are not found far away. The position of woman in the East today is not in the West. In both cases there is a difference in their morals and values which decide whether a woman is good or bad. One civilization cannot be fully compared to another. First of all, it is doubtful whether these female idols were made for worship or because the status of women was high in the society or they are a sign of birth and fertility or they are all idols of pregnant women. Most of the female sculptures are found in the vast region from southern France to Siberia. And their antiquity is estimated from 23 to 21 thousand BC, the biggest problem about them is that they can not be considered "pregnant" in any way. And even if such a hypothesis is made about someone, it is only because of their extremely small volume, which is only 3.7 cm to 4 cm, and the ancient artist made a sculpture in such a small volume. Can't figure out. Archaeologists have suggested that the statues may have been used in a magical ritual, but this theory is now dead. And even assuming this is impossible, was this the place of women in every society in ancient times? While we also have written and pictorial evidence that completely negates this impression. The truth is that there is as much talk about these statues as there are mouths and this can be said with absolute certainty. That in Europe where these researches and ideas are a great way to make money, these ideas and new ideas will never end because Western researchers themselves do not like it! In the future, it is hoped that organizations with "third gender" rights will also look at this, and that those statues, especially those that are free of male and female organs, or in which both organs are found, will be given a third gender. Declare and claim that in ancient times they were actually worshiped. And believe me, this "so-called scientific society" in Europe will also have a lot of supportive scholars. The statues that have been found since the Far Stone Age did not live up to their expectations, but the excavations at Chatalhovik, Turkey, filled them with new expectations. Chatalhoyuk is a site in the province of Konya, Turkey, where traces of a human population have been found around 6000 BC. Undoubtedly, this place has become a "sacred place" for feminists, which they consider to be the best place to visit. Excavations at the site began for the first time in 1961, led by British archaeologist James Mallart. James's wife was also involved in the excavations with her husband, and both were living in the second wave of feminism, which engulfed the whole of Europe. Now James, perhaps in order to please his wife or to keep her heart, expressed the idea that the society that existed at this place more or less eight thousand years ago was the Umayyad society. During the excavation, she also found a female statue in a chair with her arms outstretched in the shape of a leopard. The discovery of the statue caused a stir in feminist circles and it was claimed that for the first time a complete statue of the motherland was found which was also worshiped. The description of this statue was that its head and face are completely missing and it is the statue of a very fat man who can be both a man and a woman. The face and arms will be recreated in recent times in the image that is available on the internet. The statue's breasts are prominent and the abdomen is down. Feminist experts believe that the woman was pregnant and was sitting in a chair to give birth because of the abdomen. There is no doubt that the breasts at first glance give the impression of being a woman because of the breasts, but this is the way the European mind sees things and shows them to others, if only for a moment. If we try to come out and look at it with the idea that it is a statue of a woman, it will look like a wrestler, who was huge and his breasts were tilted down when he was young. Wrestlers like wrestlers. He is so fat that his bulging belly covers the middle part of his legs. Just thinking that such a belly is the belly of a pregnant woman is not final. Anyone can easily come to this conclusion because of the absence of his face and head and this conclusion will not be so wrong because the idol he is depicting must have been a weak old chief of the tribe like his chair. From the obvious. Another thing to keep in mind is that the notion that these early sculptors of ancient times were masters of the art is merely a figment of imagination, but the ugliness and primitive nature of these sculptures show that The art was still in its infancy. And in such a case, it is possible that an artist wants to be a man, but due to immaturity, the characteristics of a woman emerge or he wants to create a woman and the characteristics of a man emerge. After 1965, Turkey deported James Millart from the country for stealing archeology and banned him from entering the country. He was accused of smuggling rare statues out of Turkey for 240 million Dutch marks. This allegation was proved true. Known throughout history as the "Durac Scandal." As a result of the theft, excavations at Chatalhovik began in 1991 under the supervision of new experts. Only 4% of Chatalhoyuk was excavated, and these new archaeologists completely refuted the notion that the statue had anything to do with Umayyad times or worship. He believes it is the image of a frail old woman who may have been a mother or respected in the family. They also discovered some more feminine features, including many men, children, and animal statues, which proved that if the Chatalhovik civilization did not belong to the patriarchal society, it had nothing to do with the maternal society. Despite all these facts, the feminist movement insists on considering this place a sacred place A well-known Turkish tourism company has announced a regular tourism program called "Visiting the Mother Earth" to earn money, and a hotel and a temple are being built near the site for this purpose. Members of feminist movements around the world consider the place sacred and visit it. Similar jokes continue in many parts of the world. (to be continued)
.jpg)